TLDR
- Ohio Casino Control Commission warns licensed sportsbooks that offering prediction markets could jeopardize their gaming licenses
- The regulator states it will consider prediction market involvement when evaluating continued suitability of sports gaming licensees
- Ohio is one of seven states that issued cease-and-desist letters to prediction market platforms like Kalshi, Robinhood, and Crypto.com
- FanDuel signed a deal with CME Group while DraftKings has held talks with Railbird platform about potential partnerships
- The warning comes as Ohio increases oversight of sports betting, with Governor DeWine calling for a complete ban on prop bets
The Ohio Casino Control Commission has warned licensed sportsbooks that offering prediction markets could put their operating licenses at risk. The regulator sent letters to all licensed operators stating it will consider prediction market involvement when evaluating their continued suitability.
The commission made clear that offering or facilitating unlicensed sports gaming in Ohio raises questions about licensee reputation and gaming integrity. The warning applies even if sportsbooks exclude Ohio residents from prediction markets, as this would not alleviate regulatory concerns.
Ohio operates one of the largest legal sports betting markets in the United States. The state has been increasing oversight of the gambling sector in recent months following various controversies.
The regulator specifically stated it would consider administrative action against licensees that associate with companies operating illegally in the state. While the letter does not explicitly threaten license revocation, the implications are clear for operators considering prediction market expansion.
Seven States Target Prediction Platforms
Ohio joined six other states in issuing cease-and-desist letters to prediction market platform Kalshi over its sports event contracts. The commission also sent orders to Robinhood and Crypto.com regarding their prediction market offerings.
Robinhood filed lawsuits against Nevada and New Jersey regulators last week as it seeks to relaunch sports markets before the football season. However, no court cases have emerged in Ohio between regulators and the prediction market platforms.
The regulatory pushback comes as prediction markets gain popularity among retail investors and gamblers. These platforms allow users to bet on various outcomes beyond traditional sports events.
Kalshi recently entered sports betting earlier this month, expanding from its traditional focus on political and economic events. The platform has self-certified some touchdown prop markets that could cover both NFL and college games.
Major Sportsbooks Eye Prediction Market Deals
The commission revealed it knows some Ohio licensed sportsbooks are planning partnerships with prediction market platforms. FanDuel signed a deal with CME Group last week, though Nevada gaming regulators also raised concerns about that partnership.
DraftKings has held discussions with prediction platform Railbird about potential collaboration. CEO Jason Robins said the company was monitoring the prediction market space but made no concrete commitments.
FanDuel has stated it will not offer sports markets through CME, which primarily handles financial contracts. The company appears to be taking a cautious approach following regulatory warnings across multiple states.
If other states follow Ohio’s lead in threatening betting licenses, major operators may abandon prediction market plans entirely. Maintaining existing licenses remains essential for sportsbook survival in competitive markets.
Prop Bet Crackdown Creates Opening
Ohio’s stance on prediction markets comes after the commission launched an investigation into suspicious betting involving two Cleveland Guardians pitchers. The scandal prompted Governor Mike DeWine to call for a complete ban on prop bets.
Ohio already prohibits prop betting on college sports, but a ban on professional sports prop bets would be unprecedented. Such restrictions could drive users toward prediction market platforms that offer similar betting options.
The regulatory environment creates a complex situation for licensed sportsbooks in Ohio. Operators must balance avoiding regulatory action against missing potential revenue from emerging prediction market opportunities.
The commission’s letter leaves some ambiguity about whether separate licenses might allow prediction market offerings. However, it remains unclear if this approach would satisfy regulatory requirements or protect existing sportsbook licenses.
The warning puts Ohio sportsbooks in a difficult position as prediction markets continue growing in popularity across other states where regulations remain less restrictive.
